Library

What to read next, and why that one

106 books, papers and courses, each with the reason it earns your time rather than a summary of what is in it. Two of the cards say where the popular version of the work differs from the work. Nothing here links to a shop.

9 of these 106 cards are marked Public and open on this site. The rest open inside an account, where the reading state and the paths are.

Unreviewed — agent-drafted

5 of the 106 cards in this catalogue were drafted by a software agent and have not yet been read against the evidence rules. No card quotes the work itself; each one is a description written for this catalogue, with the bibliographic details checked against a public catalogue.

Reviewed — a delegated second read (D-295, D-356)

101 of the 106 cards have been through the delegated second read. Reviewed on 2026-10-20 against the content and evidence rules: every sentence was read against them, and at least one citation in each unit that cites was re-resolved against the raw record it names. The owner delegated the read on 2026-10-20 and the Lead signed on his behalf (D-356, by the method of D-295) — it is a delegated review, not the owner's own reading of the page.

Start here

Thinking in Bets: Making Smarter Decisions When You Don't Have All the Facts

We recommend it as the short one to read first: it takes an evening and it makes the decision journal in Brain Logic feel obvious rather than like homework.

BookAnnie DukeAbout 6 hours

Why this onePublic

If you would rather have an order

25 short paths

Each path is three to six items and a reason for the sequence. That is a commitment somebody might keep; a twenty-item path is a wish.

Reading beside the Foundation track
Four works that sit under the eight Foundation modules: naming the problem, writing to think, and recording a decision before its outcome is known. Read in this order, each one earns the next.
1. Thinking in Bets: Making Smarter Decisions When You Don't Have All the FactsPublicStart here because the Foundation track rests on one separation — the quality of a decision and the quality of its outcome — and this is the shortest book that makes it stick.
2. How to Take Smart NotesNext, because the writing-to-think module asks you to keep something, and this is the smallest system that survives contact with a real week.
3. Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and BiasesThird, when the sorting of facts from assumptions has started to feel easy: eight pages that show how the sorting goes wrong.
4. Superforecasting: The Art and Science of PredictionLast, because the decision journal is only worth reviewing if the entries were specific enough to be marked wrong, and this is what that looks like.
Reading beside Family 1 — Strategic and Commercial
Direction, constraints, alternatives and the pre-mortem. Four works covering the Strategist, the Builder, the Negotiator and the Decision-Maker.
1. Good Strategy, Bad Strategy: The Difference and Why it MattersFirst, because the Strategist mode asks what you are deliberately not doing, and this book is the test for whether your plan has an answer.
2. The Goal: A Process of Ongoing ImprovementSecond, for the Builder: a story in which improving the wrong station changes nothing, which no summary of the idea can teach you.
3. Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving InThird, for the Negotiator, and read it before the conversation rather than after: the preparation is the content.
4. Back to the future: Temporal perspective in the explanation of eventsFourth, the two hours behind the pre-mortem in the Decision-Maker module, so you know why treating the failure as certain matters.
Reading beside Family 2 — Analytical and Systems
What is true, and how the system actually works. Five works for the Scientist, the Analyst, the Investigator and the Systems Thinker.
1. The Art of Statistics: How to Learn from DataFirst, because the Scientist and the Analyst both live on two questions — out of how many, and compared to what — and this book answers them with real cases.
2. Calling Bullshit: Data Reasoning in a Digital WorldSecond, for practice rather than theory: eleven case studies of a claim taken apart, one a week.
3. Conditions for intuitive expertise: A failure to disagreeThird, so that scepticism does not become a habit of dismissing every hunch: this paper states exactly when a practised hunch is worth trusting.
4. Thinking in Systems: A PrimerFourth, for the Systems Thinker, and it is short enough to read in the two evenings before you draw your first loop.
5. Do “Brain-Training” Programs Work?PublicFifth, as the exam: a long review whose method you can now follow, about the very category this product sits in.
Reading beside Family 3 — Creative and Adaptive
Generating options, borrowing a solved problem, and the learning loop that closes back into Brain Mastery. Five works for the Creator, the Inventor, the Learner and the Synthesiser.
1. Range: Why Generalists Triumph in a Specialized WorldFirst, for the Inventor: the argument that distant analogies are a working method rather than a decoration.
2. How to Take Smart NotesSecond, because generating options and recombining them needs somewhere for the options to live between sessions.
3. Make It Stick: The Science of Successful LearningThird, for the Learner, and the one book on this path whose exercises you can start in the same sitting.
4. Test-Enhanced LearningPublicFourth, the experiment under the Learner's central question — can I reproduce this without looking?
5. Made to Stick: Why Some Ideas Survive and Others DieFifth, for the Synthesiser, whose whole test is whether you can explain the thing to one named person.
I want to make decisions I can defend even when they turn out badly.
Five works on stating a choice so it can be reviewed, and on the errors that arrive uninvited. Together they are about twenty-six hours.
1. Thinking in Bets: Making Smarter Decisions When You Don't Have All the FactsPublicOne evening, and it gives you the sentence the rest of the path builds on: judge the process, not the result.
2. Back to the future: Temporal perspective in the explanation of eventsTwo hours, and it hands you the single most useful ten minutes to spend on any plan you have already committed to.
3. Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and BiasesEight pages that will catch you out at least once, which is the point of reading them before the books that summarise them.
4. Thinking, Fast and SlowNow the long one, because you have met the original findings and can read the book as an argument rather than as a list.
5. Conditions for intuitive expertise: A failure to disagreeFinish here so the path does not end in blanket distrust of your own judgement, which would be the wrong lesson.
I want what I study to still be there next term, not next week.
The practical method first, then the evidence under it, then one memory technique for the arbitrary lists that method does not cover.
1. Make It Stick: The Science of Successful LearningStart here and start tonight: it is the only card on this path whose first exercise takes ten minutes.
2. Test-Enhanced LearningPublicRead the experiment behind the advice, because seeing the design is what stops you quietly reverting to re-reading.
3. Distributed practice in verbal recall tasks: A review and quantitative synthesisThen the synthesis that decides where your review dates should fall, which depends on the date you actually need the material.
4. Improving Students’ Learning With Effective Learning TechniquesPublicFourth, as the reference to keep: when two sources disagree about a technique, this is where you check.
5. Moonwalking with EinsteinLast, for the material the rest of the path handles badly — arbitrary ordered lists — and for an honest account of what the technique does not cover.
My day is in fragments and I want one hour of it whole.
One book of procedure, one of measurement, and two short papers so you can tell which claims about attention are measured and which are argued.
1. Deep Work: Rules for Focused Success in a Distracted WorldFirst for the procedure — blocks in a calendar and a shutdown routine — while remembering its evidence is experience rather than trials.
2. The cost of interrupted workSecond, one hour, and it reframes the cost: the work still got finished, and it cost more stress to finish it.
3. Attention Span: The New Science of Finding Focus and Fighting Distraction in the Digital AgeThird, the twenty-year measurement programme behind the headlines, from the researcher who ran it.
4. Cognitive control in media multitaskersLast, as the exercise in reading limits: a real finding, and a case study in how a correlation acquired a direction on the way to the press.
I want to judge a health or science claim for myself.
The reasoning, then the worked examples, then two reviews of a category where the marketing ran ahead of the evidence — including this one.
1. The Art of Statistics: How to Learn from DataFirst, because every question that follows is a version of one of its two: out of how many, and compared to what.
2. Calling Bullshit: Data Reasoning in a Digital WorldSecond for practice, a case study a week, which is how this becomes a habit rather than an opinion.
3. Do “Brain-Training” Programs Work?PublicThird, the review that sets out what a study would have to show before a training claim is allowed to be made.
4. Working Memory Training Does Not Improve Performance on Measures of Intelligence or Other Measures of “Far Transfer”Fourth, the meta-analytic companion, and the reason no result screen in this product says anything about your life beyond the task.
5. The Idea of the Brain: The Past and Future of NeuroscienceFinish with the history, which shows how much of any era's brain talk is inherited from its favourite machine.
The same problem comes back every few weeks and I want to know why.
A short primer, a novel that makes queues visible, and — only if you want to test a loop rather than describe one — a full course.
1. Thinking in Systems: A PrimerFirst, and stop after it if the loop you draw already explains your problem, which happens more often than the shelf admits.
2. The Goal: A Process of Ongoing ImprovementSecond, because most recurring personal problems are queues, and this is the least boring way to learn to look for the pile-up.
3. Introduction to System Dynamics (MIT 15.871)Third only if you want to simulate the loop and be wrong in a way that shows, which costs about thirty hours.
I have a negotiation or a difficult conversation and about a week to prepare.
One short book to read this week, one to recognise what is being run on you, and two on making a case land. Ordered by how soon the conversation is.
1. Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving InFirst and immediately: five hours, and the preparation it asks for is most of the improvement available to you this week.
2. Made to Stick: Why Some Ideas Survive and Others DieSecond, for the half of the conversation that is explanation rather than negotiation.
3. Influence: The Psychology of PersuasionThird, mainly as defence: recognising the principle being used on you is the useful half of this book.
4. Negotiation and Conflict Management (MIT 15.667)Last and only afterwards, because its role-play exercises need a partner and an evening rather than a deadline.
I want to stop dabbling and get properly good at a single skill.
The framework, the original paper it came from, the strongest argument against applying it everywhere, and the reason a hard evening sometimes teaches nothing.
1. Peak: Secrets from the New Science of ExpertisePublicFirst, from the researcher himself, which is also where the ten-thousand-hours slogan gets corrected.
2. The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performanceSecond, the 1993 paper, so you can see what was measured before it became a round number.
3. Range: Why Generalists Triumph in a Specialized WorldThird, the argument against, and worth reading before you commit a year: some domains do not give the feedback the framework assumes.
4. Cognitive Load During Problem Solving: Effects on LearningFourth, because the commonest failure is an evening of genuine effort that left nothing behind, and this paper explains that specific evening.
5. Why Don't Students Like School?: A Cognitive Scientist Answers Questions about How the Mind Works and What It Means for the ClassroomLast, for the design questions — background knowledge, load, and why a skill often stays stuck in the setting it was learned in.
The papers here feel like they were written for someone else.
A free introductory term, then the two long books, then a full course for anyone who wants the imaging evidence first-hand. This is a season of reading, not a week.
1. Introduction to Psychology (Yale PSYC 110)Start here, with transcripts rather than video if time is short, and stop once the three Foundations lectures have landed.
2. Thinking, Fast and SlowSecond, because almost every later card either builds on it or argues with it.
3. Behave: The Biology of Humans at Our Best and WorstThird, twenty hours well spent on the one habit that matters most here: refusing a single-cause story about a person.
4. The Human Brain (MIT 9.13)Last and optional, for anyone who wants to judge an imaging claim from the evidence rather than from a summary of it.
Somebody quoted a statistic at me and I could not tell whether it was true.
Six works on reading a number closely enough to see what it can support. The first takes an evening and will already change what you notice; the last two are for anyone who has to produce numbers as well as read them.
1. How to Lie with StatisticsStart here because it is a hundred and forty-two pages, first published in 1954, and every trick in it is on a screen you will look at today.
2. Naked Statistics: Stripping the Dread from the DataSecond, for the tools themselves — what a regression claims, what a standard error is doing there — with the arithmetic kept out of the way.
3. Risk Savvy: How to Make Good DecisionsThird, for the one trick that works immediately and never stops working: rewrite any probability as a count of people.
4. Helping Doctors and Patients Make Sense of Health StatisticsFourth, the review behind that trick, because these are the numbers people meet at the moments that matter most.
5. The Signal and the Noise: The Art and Science of PredictionFifth, moving from reading a number to making one, across the fields that got better at predicting and the fields that never kept score.
6. How to Measure Anything: Finding the Value of Intangibles in BusinessLast, for anyone who has to produce an estimate at work, and who would rather state a range honestly than a point precisely.
I keep reading confident claims about psychology and I want to know which ones survived.
Six papers in the order the argument developed: first a popular idea tested and found wanting, then two more, then the three papers that explain why the field produced so many of them. It is the most useful reading on this shelf for anyone who quotes research.
1. Learning Styles: Concepts and EvidencePublicStart with the cleanest case: a hugely popular idea, the experiment that would test it stated precisely, and what happened when anyone ran it.
2. To What Extent and Under Which Circumstances Are Growth Mind-Sets Important to Academic Achievement? Two Meta-AnalysesPublicSecond, the same exercise on a warmer idea, and a demonstration that a small average and a real effect in one subgroup are compatible findings.
3. Much ado about grit: A meta-analytic synthesis of the grit literatureThird, the question every newly named trait should be asked: does it measure anything we were not already measuring?
4. False-Positive Psychology: Undisclosed Flexibility in Data Collection and Analysis Allows Presenting Anything as SignificantFourth, the mechanism — ordinary undeclared analytic choices, compounding, used here to prove something impossible.
5. Why Most Published Research Findings Are FalseFifth, the arithmetic that turns that mechanism into an expected rate, which is a more useful thing to carry than a list of debunked studies.
6. Evaluating the replicability of social science experiments in Nature and Science between 2010 and 2015Last, the measurement: what happened when twenty-one famous experiments were repeated properly, and by how much the effects shrank.
I can pass the test and I have forgotten it a month later.
One short guide, then the three studies underneath it, then a book and a course for putting it into practice. Every technique here makes the session feel worse and the following week better, which is why knowing the evidence matters.
1. Understanding How We Learn: A Visual GuideStart with the six strategies and their evidence in one illustrated guide, so the rest of this path has somewhere to attach.
2. Retrieval PracticeSecond, the contest that settles which of two study methods wins on equal time — and shows the students predicting the wrong one.
3. Spacing Effects in Learning: A Temporal Ridgeline of Optimal RetentionThird, because knowing that spacing works leaves the useful question open: how far apart, given how long you need to remember it?
4. The shuffling of mathematics problemsFourth, the clearest case of a difficulty worth having, in a study habit almost every textbook quietly encourages.
5. A Mind for Numbers: How to Excel at Math and Science (Even If You Flunked Algebra)Fifth, written from the other side of the wall by someone who failed mathematics at school and learned it as an adult.
6. Learning How to Learn: Powerful mental tools to help you master tough subjectsLast, the course version of the same method, to be done on material you actually have to learn this month.
I want to understand my own memory rather than worry about it.
Three books from gentlest to most current, then the three papers that fixed the numbers and the limits. Read the first alone if the subject arrived because you were worried rather than curious.
1. Remember: The Science of Memory and the Art of ForgettingStart here, because most of what feels like forgetting turns out to be attention that never encoded the thing in the first place.
2. The Seven Sins of Memory: How the Mind Forgets and RemembersSecond, for the seven names — once you have them, you can say which kind of failure just happened to you.
3. Why We Remember: The Science of Memory and How It Shapes UsThird, the same subject twenty years on, with the account of what remembering is for updated by the work in between.
4. The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing informationFourth, the founding paper, more careful and funnier than the slogan taken from it.
5. The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacityFifth, the same number examined and revised downward across forty-five years, which is what a healthy literature looks like.
6. Reconstruction of automobile destruction: An example of the interaction between language and memoryLast, five pages showing that a question can change a memory rather than merely the answer to it.
I know what I should be doing and I keep not doing it.
The research first, then the popular programme built on it, then two books about effort whose claims have been revised since. The order is the argument: arrangement beats resolve, and the evidence for that is stronger than the evidence for trying harder.
1. Good Habits, Bad Habits: The Science of Making Positive Changes That StickStart with the research, and with its unflattering finding: people who seem to have more self-control have mostly arranged to need less of it.
2. Atomic Habits: An Easy and Proven Way to Build Good Habits and Break Bad OnesSecond, the practical layer over that research, taken for its specific moves rather than for its numbers.
3. Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and HappinessThird, the same lever pointed outward: there is no neutral way to present a choice, so somebody is always setting your default.
4. Mindset: How You Can Fulfill Your PotentialPublicFourth, for how you respond to a hard failure, read together with the meta-analyses that measured the effect and found it small.
5. Grit: The Power of Passion and PerseveranceLast, on sustained effort toward one long goal, with the same caution attached and the correcting paper named on the card.
I want to know what the evidence on sleep and exercise actually supports.
Two popular books each followed by the review or trial synthesis behind it, then the paper that teaches the question to ask about any stimulant. Nothing here is advice about a condition, and none of it says anything about your own outcome.
1. Why We Sleep: Unlocking the Power of Sleep and DreamsStart here for the questions and the architecture of a night, holding the card's caution in mind: check any specific claim against the review that comes next.
2. About Sleep's Role in MemorySecond, the review the popular books draw on, and the place to check any specific claim you met in one.
3. Exercised: Why Something We Never Evolved to Do Is Healthy and RewardingThird, a biologist taking the common claims about exercise one at a time and saying which have support.
4. Exercise interventions for cognitive function in adults older than 50: a systematic review with meta-analysisFourth, a synthesis of randomised trials rather than of observations, which is rare on a topic drowning in the latter.
5. Is Caffeine a Cognitive Enhancer?Last, the confound worth carrying: most studies of habitual users test them deprived, so the gain may be a reversal.
I have a decision I will have to defend, and not much time.
Motive first, then the error nobody measures, then two accounts of how experts actually decide, then the formal machinery. The first two are the ones to read this week if the decision is soon.
1. The Scout Mindset: Why Some People See Things Clearly and Others Don'tStart here because technique is useless to someone who has not yet decided they would rather be right than feel right.
2. Noise: A Flaw in Human JudgmentSecond, for the error bias does not explain: two qualified people, the same file, different answers, and nobody counting.
3. Sources of Power: How People Make DecisionsThird, the field research on how experts decide under time pressure, and the conditions their intuition needs to be worth anything.
4. The Checklist Manifesto: How to Get Things RightFourth, the cheap fix for the failures where you already knew and did not do.
5. Rationality: What It Is, Why It Seems Scarce, Why It MattersFifth, the formal machinery the popular decision books assume you already have, a chapter at a time.
6. Algorithms to Live By: The Computer Science of Human DecisionsLast, for the decisions that have a solved form: when to stop looking, what to try next, and what order to work in.
We agree on the plan and nothing that happens afterwards looks like it.
Two short books on choosing and on briefing, then a longer one on why the same problem keeps returning, then two courses for the situations where somebody is choosing against you. Strategy first, execution second, and the gap between them treated as the real subject.
1. Playing to Win: How Strategy Really WorksStart with five linked questions, each forcing a choice with something given up — a strategy a competitor could also sign is not one.
2. The Art of Action: How Leaders Close the Gaps Between Plans, Actions and ResultsSecond, because the plan is not the problem: the three gaps between plan, action and result are, and more detail widens two of them.
3. The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning OrganizationThird, for the archetypes, so a familiar shape in an unfamiliar organisation becomes recognisable rather than surprising.
4. Model ThinkingPublicFourth, twenty models rather than one, and the habit of describing a situation twice and noticing where the two disagree.
5. Game Theory (Yale ECON 159)Last, for every situation where what you should do depends on what somebody else does, taught by running the games first.
There is a conversation I have been avoiding for weeks.
One book on the conversation you are avoiding, one on the negotiation you cannot walk away from, one on why arguing works better than thinking alone, and one on the sentences themselves. Four readings, in that order.
1. Difficult Conversations: How to Discuss What Matters MostStart here, because every hard conversation is three at once and it goes wrong when the one about identity runs unnamed.
2. Never Split the Difference: Negotiating as if Your Life Depended on ItSecond, for the techniques you can use tomorrow, with its evidence tier stated: one practitioner's field experience, not a trial.
3. The Enigma of ReasonThird, for the argument that reasoning was built for company, which is why writing your case for a reader beats turning it over alone.
4. The Sense of Style: The Thinking Person's Guide to Writing in the 21st CenturyLast, on the sentences, because an argument nobody can follow has not been made.
I want to read a brain claim and see what it does not say.
Four hours of correction first, then the long arguments, then the paper that split attention into separable systems, then a philosophy course for the questions no measurement settles. This is the path behind our own rule that the render is a map.
1. Seven and a Half Lessons About the BrainStart here: four hours that change how every other claim on this list reads, including the ones on this site.
2. How Emotions Are Made: The Secret Life of the BrainSecond, the long version of that argument, and a demonstration of a dominant theory being replaced by method rather than by rhetoric.
3. Consciousness and the Brain: Deciphering How the Brain Codes Our ThoughtsThird, for the best worked example on this shelf of an unanswerable question turned into a laboratory programme.
4. Reading in the Brain: The New Science of How We ReadFourth, a long case study in culture reusing biology, and the most concrete of the four.
5. The Attention System of the Human BrainFifth, because one word — focus — covers at least three capacities that can come apart, and later tests, such as the Attention Network Test, were built on this split.
6. Minds and Machines (MIT 24.09)Last and optional, for the questions no brain measurement will settle, which is a useful thing to be able to say out loud.
I want to tell the difference between understanding something and recognising it.
The famous paper read as a paper, then the book by the researcher who measures the thing it is about, then two readings that put the skill under pressure. The most uncomfortable path here.
1. Unskilled and unaware of it: How difficulties in recognizing one's own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessmentsStart with the original, which is more careful and more interesting than the version of it you have already met.
2. Know Thyself: The Science of Self-AwarenessSecond, from a researcher who measures how well confidence tracks accuracy, and finds the two partly separable.
3. The Pen Is Mightier Than the Keyboard: Advantages of Longhand Over Laptop Note TakingThird, for a finding about summarising while you listen, and for watching a single study become a rule of thumb before the evidence arrived.
4. Introduction to Mathematical ThinkingLast, the hardest course on this shelf, where the gap between feeling that a proof works and knowing it does is unmissable.
I want to be genuinely good at one difficult thing, starting late.
The meta-analysis first, deliberately, so the rest is read with the right expectations. Then a project method, a course for starting late, and two books on where original work actually comes from.
1. Deliberate Practice and Performance in Music, Games, Sports, Education, and Professions: A Meta-AnalysisStart here so the rest lands correctly: practice is important, it explains much less than the slogan claims, and the share differs sharply by domain.
2. Ultralearning: Master Hard Skills, Outsmart the Competition, and Accelerate Your CareerSecond, for the project structure — a scope, a date, and one test that says whether it worked.
3. Mindshift: Break Through Obstacles to Learning and Discover Your Hidden PotentialThird, for studying when nobody sets the syllabus, and for treating an existing background as an asset rather than a detour.
4. Creativity: Flow and the Psychology of Discovery and InventionFourth, for the systems model: a contribution is a relation between a person, a domain and the people who judge it.
5. Where Good Ideas Come From: The Natural History of InnovationLast, for the conditions rather than a technique, which is the honest shape of this subject.
I would rather learn the subject properly than read one more summary of it.
Four full courses and one paper; the courses are free to watch. This is a season of study rather than a week, and a member who finishes it will read every other card here with the methods already in view.
1. Introduction to Psychology (MIT 9.00SC)Start with the survey, because knowing what each subfield studies and how is what makes the papers here readable.
2. Gorillas in our midst: sustained inattentional blindness for dynamic eventsSecond, ninety seconds that make the cost of concentration visible, and then the paper that measured it systematically.
3. Philosophy and the Science of Human Nature (Yale PHIL 181)Third, for the older question every practical shelf here assumes an answer to, taught alongside the modern evidence.
4. Psychology and Economics (MIT 14.13)Fourth, the behavioural material as economists teach it, with the models written down and the field evidence in view.
5. Introduction to Probability (MIT RES.6-012)Last, the probability course, because most of the arguments on the evidence shelf are arguments about conditional probability.

By subject

Collections

Books

Thinking, Fast and Slow
Daniel Kahneman2011About 14 hoursintermediate
We recommend it first on this shelf because it is the shared reference: read it and every later card, including the ones that disagree with it, becomes readable.
Superforecasting: The Art and Science of Prediction
Philip E. Tetlock and Dan Gardner2015About 9 hoursbeginner
We recommend it beside the decision journal because it is the clearest published account of what a forecast has to look like before reviewing it teaches you anything.
Thinking in Bets: Making Smarter Decisions When You Don't Have All the FactsPublic
Annie Duke2018About 6 hoursbeginner
We recommend it as the short one to read first: it takes an evening and it makes the decision journal in Brain Logic feel obvious rather than like homework.
The Art of Statistics: How to Learn from Data
David Spiegelhalter2019About 10 hoursintermediate
We recommend it because every Fuel dossier in this product is built the way this book reads a claim, and reading it makes the grades on those cards legible.
Thinking in Systems: A Primer
Donella H. Meadows, edited by Diana Wright2008About 7 hoursbeginner
We recommend it as the entry to the systems shelf because it is short, it is diagrams rather than jargon, and one loop drawn badly is worth more than the vocabulary learned well.
The Goal: A Process of Ongoing Improvement
Eliyahu M. Goldratt and Jeff Cox2008About 8 hoursbeginner
We recommend it because almost every personal productivity problem is a queue problem wearing a discipline costume, and this is the book that makes queues visible.
Good Strategy, Bad Strategy: The Difference and Why it Matters
Richard P. Rumelt2011About 9 hoursintermediate
We recommend it whenever a plan feels busy but directionless: it gives you a test you can apply to your own writing in ten minutes.
Noise: A Flaw in Human Judgment
Daniel Kahneman, Olivier Sibony and Cass R. Sunstein2022About 13 hoursintermediate
We recommend it as the correction to a shelf that leans on bias: most of the wrong answers you produce are not a systematic tilt, they are scatter, and scatter has a different remedy.
The Scout Mindset: Why Some People See Things Clearly and Others Don't
Julia Galef2021About 7 hoursbeginner
We recommend it first on this shelf because the other books here are technique, and technique is useless to someone who has not yet decided they would rather be right than feel right.
The Signal and the Noise: The Art and Science of Prediction
Nate Silver2012About 14 hoursintermediate
We recommend it beside Superforecasting: that book shows what disciplined forecasters do, and this one shows the fields where nobody kept score and what happened to their predictions as a result.
How to Measure Anything: Finding the Value of Intangibles in Business
Douglas W. Hubbard2014About 11 hoursintermediate
We recommend it as the practical partner to the statistics books here: they teach you to read someone else's number, and this one teaches you to produce your own without pretending to more precision than you have.
Naked Statistics: Stripping the Dread from the Data
Charles Wheelan2013About 8 hoursbeginner
We recommend it as the first statistics card, before The Art of Statistics: it is shorter, it assumes less, and it gets a reader to the point where the harder book reads easily.
How to Lie with Statistics
Darrell Huff, illustrated by Irving Geis1993About 3 hoursbeginner
We recommend it because it is the shortest complete education in reading a number on this shelf, and because its age is the point: none of these tricks is new, and none of them has stopped working.
Risk Savvy: How to Make Good Decisions
Gerd Gigerenzer2015About 8 hoursbeginner
We recommend it as the single most useful hour on this shelf for a member who has to read numbers about their own life, because the format trick it teaches works immediately and never stops working.
The Enigma of Reason
Hugo Mercier and Dan Sperber2019About 16 hoursadvanced
We recommend it as the hardest and most rewarding card on this shelf, and as the reason we ask members to write a decision down for a reader rather than think it through in their head.
Rationality: What It Is, Why It Seems Scarce, Why It Matters
Steven Pinker2021About 12 hoursintermediate
We recommend it as the reference card of this shelf: the one to keep and return to a chapter at a time, rather than to read once and shelve.
Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness
Richard H. Thaler and Cass R. Sunstein2009About 9 hoursbeginner
We recommend it with a caution attached: it is the clearest introduction to choice architecture, and parts of its evidence base have been revised downward since 2009, so read the mechanism and check any specific result before quoting it.
Sources of Power: How People Make Decisions
Gary Klein1999About 10 hoursintermediate
We recommend it beside Kahneman and Klein's joint paper on this shelf, because the two of them worked out in public exactly when a practitioner's intuition can be relied on and when it cannot.
The Checklist Manifesto: How to Get Things Right
Atul Gawande2010About 6 hoursbeginner
We recommend it as the shortest systems card here: it is about the gap between knowing and doing, which is the gap most of the reading on this shelf eventually runs into.
Algorithms to Live By: The Computer Science of Human Decisions
Brian Christian and Tom Griffiths2016About 12 hoursintermediate
We recommend it for members who like a problem stated precisely: it gives a name and a solved form to several decisions that otherwise feel like temperament.
The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization
Peter M. Senge1993About 16 hoursintermediate
We recommend it after Thinking in Systems: Meadows gives you the vocabulary in two hundred pages, and Senge gives you the archetypes and the organisational cases to practise on.
Playing to Win: How Strategy Really Works
A. G. Lafley and Roger L. Martin2013About 7 hoursbeginner
We recommend it beside Good Strategy Bad Strategy: Rumelt shows you what a real strategy looks like from outside, and this gives you the five questions to build one from inside.
The Art of Action: How Leaders Close the Gaps Between Plans, Actions and Results
Stephen Bungay2022About 9 hoursintermediate
We recommend it for anyone who has to get work done through other people, and as the practical counterpart to the strategy cards here, which stop at the decision and not at the doing.
Make It Stick: The Science of Successful Learning
Peter C. Brown, Henry L. Roediger III and Mark A. McDaniel2014About 7 hoursbeginner
We recommend it as the first card on the learning shelf because it is the one whose exercises you can start during the same sitting.
Why Don't Students Like School?: A Cognitive Scientist Answers Questions about How the Mind Works and What It Means for the Classroom
Daniel T. Willingham2021About 8 hoursbeginner
We recommend it beside Make It Stick because it explains why the methods work rather than only that they do, which is what makes them adjustable when they stop fitting your material.
Peak: Secrets from the New Science of ExpertisePublic
Anders Ericsson and Robert Pool2016About 8 hoursintermediate
We recommend it whenever effort feels high and progress feels flat: the usual cause is a target with no feedback attached, and this is the book that names that.
Range: Why Generalists Triumph in a Specialized World
David J. Epstein2019About 9 hoursbeginner
We recommend it as the argument against the rest of the learning shelf: read it after Peak and decide for yourself which one describes the thing you are actually doing.
How to Take Smart Notes
Sönke Ahrens2022About 5 hoursbeginner
We recommend it beside the Brain Logic writing-to-think module because it is the same idea at the scale of a year rather than a page.
Moonwalking with Einstein
Joshua Foer2011About 7 hoursbeginner
We recommend it as the one book on this shelf that is a story rather than a manual, and as an honest account of what a trained memory technique does and does not cover.
Deep Work: Rules for Focused Success in a Distracted World
Cal Newport2016About 7 hoursbeginner
We recommend it as the operational card on the focus shelf, with the caveat that its evidence is argument and experience rather than trials — the papers on this shelf are where the measurements are.
Attention Span: The New Science of Finding Focus and Fighting Distraction in the Digital Age
Gloria Mark2023About 8 hoursintermediate
We recommend it beside Deep Work as the measured counterpart: one book tells you how to arrange the day, the other tells you what has actually been observed about days.
Understanding How We Learn: A Visual Guide
Yana Weinstein and Megan Sumeracki, illustrated by Oliver Caviglioli2018About 6 hoursbeginner
We recommend it as the shortest way to the whole method: Make It Stick tells the story, and this one is the reference card you keep beside your desk.
A Mind for Numbers: How to Excel at Math and Science (Even If You Flunked Algebra)
Barbara Oakley2014About 7 hoursbeginner
We recommend it as the companion to the Learning How to Learn course on this shelf — same author, same method, and the book is the version you can annotate.
Ultralearning: Master Hard Skills, Outsmart the Competition, and Accelerate Your Career
Scott H. Young2019About 8 hoursintermediate
We recommend it for the project structure rather than the anecdotes: it is the book that turns the evidence-backed techniques on this shelf into something with a start date and a finish line.
Good Habits, Bad Habits: The Science of Making Positive Changes That Stick
Wendy Wood2019About 9 hoursintermediate
We recommend it before Atomic Habits for a reader who wants the research rather than the programme: it is the source much of the popular writing draws on, and it is more careful about what is known.
Atomic Habits: An Easy and Proven Way to Build Good Habits and Break Bad Ones
James Clear2018About 6 hoursbeginner
We recommend it as the practical layer over Wendy Wood's research, with one caveat stated plainly: its specific claims about how long a habit takes to form, and its stories, are illustrations rather than findings, so read the mechanism and check any number elsewhere.
Mindset: How You Can Fulfill Your PotentialPublic
Carol S. Dweck2012About 7 hoursbeginner
We recommend it with its correction attached: the frame is useful for a reader facing a hard subject, and the measured average effect on achievement is small and inconsistent, which the card beside it sets out.
Grit: The Power of Passion and Perseverance
Angela Duckworth2018About 8 hoursbeginner
We recommend it as a paired reading with the meta-analysis that revised it: the two together are a better education in how psychology travels from a lab to a bookshop than either is alone.
The Seven Sins of Memory: How the Mind Forgets and Remembers
Daniel L. Schacter2001About 9 hoursintermediate
We recommend it because this product measures memory tasks, and a member who has read this will hold their own results at the right distance: a reading of a task, not a report on their past.
Remember: The Science of Memory and the Art of Forgetting
Lisa Genova2021About 5 hoursbeginner
We recommend it as the gentlest entry to the memory shelf, and as the card to read before Schacter if the subject arrived because you were worried rather than curious.
Why We Remember: The Science of Memory and How It Shapes Us
Charan Ranganath2025About 9 hoursintermediate
We recommend it as the current counterpart to Schacter's classic: the same subject twenty years on, with the account of what remembering is for updated by the work in between.
Know Thyself: The Science of Self-Awareness
Stephen M. Fleming2021About 11 hoursadvanced
We recommend it as the deepest card on the learning shelf, and as the book behind why this product asks members to state what they expect before they see a result.
Why We Sleep: Unlocking the Power of Sleep and Dreams
Matthew Walker2018About 10 hoursbeginner
We recommend it with an explicit caution: read it for the questions and the architecture, and check any specific number against Rasch and Born's review, which is the card next to it. Nothing here is advice about a condition.
Exercised: Why Something We Never Evolved to Do Is Healthy and Rewarding
Daniel E. Lieberman2021About 13 hoursintermediate
We recommend it as the counterweight to a genre that promises outcomes: it is the book that teaches a member how to read the next exercise headline rather than what to believe about this one.
Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion
Robert B. Cialdini2021About 9 hoursbeginner
We recommend it for defence first: most members meet these principles a hundred times a day as targets, and naming them is what makes them visible.
Behave: The Biology of Humans at Our Best and Worst
Robert M. Sapolsky2017About 20 hoursadvanced
We recommend it as the long one worth the time: it is the card that makes the rest of the neuroscience shelf, and every brain claim you meet elsewhere, easier to read sceptically.
The Idea of the Brain: The Past and Future of Neuroscience
Matthew Cobb2020About 12 hoursintermediate
We recommend it because this product draws a brain on a screen, and a member who has read this card will hold that drawing at exactly the right distance: a map, not a scan.
Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In
Roger Fisher, William Ury and Bruce Patton2011About 5 hoursbeginner
We recommend it as the shortest path to a real improvement in a conversation you will have this month, and as the reading for the Negotiator mode in Brain Logic.
Made to Stick: Why Some Ideas Survive and Others Die
Chip Heath and Dan Heath2007About 6 hoursbeginner
We recommend it with the Synthesiser mode: explaining a thing to one specific person is the fastest test of whether you actually have it.
Seven and a Half Lessons About the Brain
Lisa Feldman Barrett2021About 4 hoursbeginner
We recommend it as the first neuroscience card for every member, because four hours here changes how every other brain claim you meet reads, including the ones on this site.
How Emotions Are Made: The Secret Life of the Brain
Lisa Feldman Barrett2018About 14 hoursadvanced
We recommend it for the member who wants the full argument behind the short book, and as a demonstration of how a dominant theory gets replaced — slowly, by method rather than by rhetoric.
Consciousness and the Brain: Deciphering How the Brain Codes Our Thoughts
Stanislas Dehaene2014About 15 hoursadvanced
We recommend it to members who want to see how a claim about the mind becomes an experiment, which is the skill this product's method page assumes and rarely gets to teach.
Reading in the Brain: The New Science of How We Read
Stanislas Dehaene2009About 14 hoursadvanced
We recommend it as the best long case study on this shelf of culture reusing biology, and as background for any member whose own learning depends on reading quickly and accurately.
Difficult Conversations: How to Discuss What Matters Most
Douglas Stone, Bruce Patton and Sheila Heen1999About 7 hoursbeginner
We recommend it beside Getting to Yes for the conversation that has no deal in it, and as the reading for members whose hardest problem this month is a person rather than a decision.
Never Split the Difference: Negotiating as if Your Life Depended on It
Chris Voss with Tahl Raz2017About 7 hoursbeginner
We recommend it as the practical counterweight to the principled-negotiation cards, with its evidence tier stated: these are field-tested techniques from one practitioner, not results from a controlled study.
The Sense of Style: The Thinking Person's Guide to Writing in the 21st Century
Steven Pinker2014About 10 hoursintermediate
We recommend it beside Made to Stick: that book is about what makes an idea survive, and this is about the sentence-level craft that decides whether it is understood at all.
Where Good Ideas Come From: The Natural History of Innovation
Steven Johnson2010About 8 hoursbeginner
We recommend it for the Creative and Adaptive family of Brain Logic, and because it argues for keeping a hunch alive rather than for a technique, which is the honest shape of this subject.
Creativity: Flow and the Psychology of Discovery and Invention
Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi1996About 12 hoursintermediate
We recommend it as the research card on the creativity shelf, and for the systems model, which is a better tool than any of the ideation techniques a member is likely to meet.

Papers

Test-Enhanced LearningPublic
Henry L. Roediger III and Jeffrey D. Karpicke2006About 1 hoursintermediate
We recommend it as the first paper anyone reads here: it is short, the design fits on one page, and it is the source of the retrieval prompts throughout Learn.
Improving Students’ Learning With Effective Learning TechniquesPublic
John Dunlosky, Katherine A. Rawson, Elizabeth J. Marsh, Mitchell J. Nathan and Daniel T. Willingham2013About 4 hoursintermediate
We recommend it as the reference for the whole learning shelf: when two books disagree about a method, this is where to check which one the evidence is behind.
Distributed practice in verbal recall tasks: A review and quantitative synthesis
Nicholas J. Cepeda, Harold Pashler, Edward Vul, John T. Wixted and Doug Rohrer2006About 3 hoursadvanced
We recommend it for anyone who wants to know why the Mastery review dates fall where they do rather than taking them on trust.
Cognitive Load During Problem Solving: Effects on Learning
John Sweller1988About 2 hoursadvanced
We recommend it because it explains a failure everyone has had — an evening of hard work that left nothing — in terms you can act on the next evening.
Do “Brain-Training” Programs Work?Public
Daniel J. Simons, Walter R. Boot, Neil Charness, Susan E. Gathercole, Christopher F. Chabris, David Z. Hambrick and Elizabeth A. L. Stine-Morrow2016About 6 hoursadvanced
We recommend it as the card that holds this product to account: our own rule that an exercise's honest line describes that exercise and nothing wider comes from exactly this review.
Working Memory Training Does Not Improve Performance on Measures of Intelligence or Other Measures of “Far Transfer”
Monica Melby-Lervåg, Thomas S. Redick and Charles Hulme2016About 3 hoursadvanced
We recommend it because a member is owed the strongest counter-evidence to the category this product sits in, from the product itself, before anyone spends an evening on it.
Conditions for intuitive expertise: A failure to disagree
Daniel Kahneman and Gary Klein2009About 2 hoursintermediate
We recommend it because most decision advice is written as if intuition were always the enemy, and the honest answer is conditional — this paper states the conditions.
Back to the future: Temporal perspective in the explanation of events
Deborah J. Mitchell, J. Edward Russo and Nancy Pennington1989About 2 hoursintermediate
We recommend it because the pre-mortem is the highest-value ten minutes in the Brain Logic decision module, and this is where it comes from.
Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases
Amos Tversky and Daniel Kahneman1974About 2 hoursintermediate
We recommend it as the shortest serious thing on this shelf: two hours here changes how you read every number you meet afterwards.
Cognitive control in media multitaskers
Eyal Ophir, Clifford Nass and Anthony D. Wagner2009About 2 hoursintermediate
We recommend it as a paired lesson: a real finding worth knowing, and a live demonstration of how a correlation becomes a cause somewhere between the journal and the phone.
The cost of interrupted work
Gloria Mark, Daniela Gudith and Ulrich Klocke2008About 1 hoursintermediate
We recommend it beside the Attention Span card: the book is the twenty-year account, this is one clean experiment you can read over a coffee.
The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance
K. Anders Ericsson, Ralf Th. Krampe and Clemens Tesch-Römer1993About 3 hoursadvanced
We recommend it as the primary source for the Peak card: read the paper if you want to argue about deliberate practice, read the book if you want to use it.
Learning Styles: Concepts and EvidencePublic
Harold Pashler, Mark McDaniel, Doug Rohrer and Robert Bjork2008About 3 hoursintermediate
We recommend it early because it is the clearest short demonstration of the difference between a claim being popular and a claim being tested, which is the habit the rest of this shelf needs.
Retrieval Practice
Jeffrey D. Karpicke and Janell R. Blunt2011About 2 hoursintermediate
We recommend it as the single most actionable paper on the learning shelf, and because its second finding — that the method that feels worse works better — explains why good study habits are hard to keep.
Spacing Effects in Learning: A Temporal Ridgeline of Optimal Retention
Nicholas J. Cepeda, Edward Vul, Doug Rohrer, John T. Wixted and Harold Pashler2008About 3 hoursadvanced
We recommend it after the distributed-practice review on this shelf: that one establishes that spacing works, and this one tells you how far apart to put the sessions.
The shuffling of mathematics problems
Doug Rohrer and Kelli Taylor2007About 2 hoursintermediate
We recommend it as the concrete case of a desirable difficulty, and because it names a study habit almost every textbook encourages that quietly costs you the week after.
The Pen Is Mightier Than the Keyboard: Advantages of Longhand Over Laptop Note Taking
Pam A. Mueller and Daniel M. Oppenheimer2014About 2 hoursintermediate
We recommend it as two lessons in one paper: a real and useful finding about summarising while you listen, and a live demonstration of how a single study becomes a rule of thumb before the evidence is in.
Deliberate Practice and Performance in Music, Games, Sports, Education, and Professions: A Meta-Analysis
Brooke N. Macnamara, David Z. Hambrick and Frederick L. Oswald2014About 4 hoursadvanced
We recommend it directly beside Peak and the Ericsson paper on this shelf: the three of them are the argument, and reading only one side of it leaves you with a slogan.
To What Extent and Under Which Circumstances Are Growth Mind-Sets Important to Academic Achievement? Two Meta-AnalysesPublic
Victoria F. Sisk, Alexander P. Burgoyne, Jingze Sun, Jennifer L. Butler and Brooke N. Macnamara2018About 4 hoursadvanced
We recommend it as the required companion to the Mindset card on this shelf: the frame is worth having and the popular claim is stronger than the measurement, and a member deserves both halves.
Much ado about grit: A meta-analytic synthesis of the grit literature
Marcus Credé, Michael C. Tynan and Peter D. Harms2017About 4 hoursadvanced
We recommend it as the correction that belongs next to Grit on this shelf, and as the clearest worked example of the question to ask whenever a new trait is named and measured.
The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information
George A. Miller1956About 2 hoursintermediate
We recommend it with the Cowan paper beside it: the pair shows a well-known number being examined, revised downward and made more precise over forty-five years, which is what a healthy literature looks like.
The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity
Nelson Cowan2001About 6 hoursadvanced
We recommend it as the best example on this shelf of a claim being made more precise rather than merely contradicted, and because four chunks is a more useful working figure than seven.
Reconstruction of automobile destruction: An example of the interaction between language and memory
Elizabeth F. Loftus and John C. Palmer1974About 1 hoursbeginner
We recommend it as the shortest paper on this shelf and one of the most consequential, and because the same effect is at work in any conversation where somebody asks you what you remember.
Gorillas in our midst: sustained inattentional blindness for dynamic events
Daniel J. Simons and Christopher F. Chabris1999About 2 hoursbeginner
We recommend it as the entry point to the focus shelf, because it makes the cost of concentration visible in ninety seconds, and because this product measures attention tasks and members should know what they measure.
The Attention System of the Human Brain
Michael I. Posner and Steven E. Petersen1990About 3 hoursadvanced
We recommend it because this product reports on attention tasks, and a member who knows attention is several systems will read their own results as a reading of one task rather than a verdict on their focus.
Unskilled and unaware of it: How difficulties in recognizing one's own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments
Justin Kruger and David Dunning1999About 3 hoursintermediate
We recommend it as the metacognition card that matters most, and as an exercise in reading the source of a claim you already thought you knew.
Why Most Published Research Findings Are False
John P. A. Ioannidis2005About 3 hoursadvanced
We recommend it as the paper that reframes reading research from trusting individual papers to asking what a field's structure makes likely, which is the only sustainable position for a non-specialist.
False-Positive Psychology: Undisclosed Flexibility in Data Collection and Analysis Allows Presenting Anything as Significant
Joseph P. Simmons, Leif D. Nelson and Uri Simonsohn2011About 2 hoursintermediate
We recommend it as the shortest complete explanation of why the reform of the last decade happened, and because the same undeclared flexibility is available to anyone reporting their own numbers, including us.
Evaluating the replicability of social science experiments in Nature and Science between 2010 and 2015
Colin F. Camerer, Anna Dreber, Felix Holzmeister and twenty-one others2018About 4 hoursadvanced
We recommend it as the calibration card for the whole shelf: it tells you how much to discount an eye-catching social science result before you have any specific reason to doubt it.
Helping Doctors and Patients Make Sense of Health Statistics
Gerd Gigerenzer, Wolfgang Gaissmaier, Elke Kurz-Milcke, Lisa M. Schwartz and Steven Woloshin2007About 6 hoursintermediate
We recommend it beside Risk Savvy for a member who wants the review rather than the popular treatment, and because these are the numbers people meet at the moments that matter most.
About Sleep's Role in Memory
Björn Rasch and Jan Born2013About 8 hoursadvanced
We recommend it as the reference behind the Why We Sleep card: read the trade book for the questions and this review for what is established, and let the difference between them teach you something.
Exercise interventions for cognitive function in adults older than 50: a systematic review with meta-analysis
Joseph Michael Northey, Nicolas Cherbuin, Kate Louise Pumpa, Disa Jane Smee and Ben Rattray2017About 4 hoursadvanced
We recommend it as the evidence card for the movement shelf, and because a member reading it will be able to tell the next headline about exercise and the brain what it left out. It reports on a population aged over 50 and says nothing about anyone's own outcome.
Is Caffeine a Cognitive Enhancer?
Astrid Nehlig2010About 3 hoursintermediate
We recommend it because members ask about stimulants, and this is the paper that teaches the question to ask about any of them, rather than an answer about whether to take one.

Courses

The Human Brain (MIT 9.13)
Prof. Nancy Kanwisher2019About 36 hoursadvanced
We recommend it as the deepest card on the neuroscience shelf, and as the one that makes our own map-not-tissue rule feel like a technical necessity rather than a legal caution.
Learning How to Learn: Powerful mental tools to help you master tough subjects
Barbara Oakley and Terrence SejnowskiAbout 12 hoursbeginner
We recommend it as the gentlest on-ramp on the learning shelf, with one caveat: read its brain-metaphor language as a teaching aid, and come here to the papers for the mechanism.
Calling Bullshit: Data Reasoning in a Digital World
Carl T. Bergstrom and Jevin D. West, University of WashingtonAbout 14 hoursbeginner
We recommend it as the practical partner to The Art of Statistics: the book gives you the reasoning, this course gives you eleven case studies of it failing in public.
Introduction to System Dynamics (MIT 15.871)
Prof. John Sterman and Prof. Hazhir Rahmandad2013About 30 hoursadvanced
We recommend it to anyone who finished Thinking in Systems wanting to test a loop rather than describe one; skip it otherwise, since thirty hours is a real cost.
Introduction to Psychology (Yale PSYC 110)
Prof. Paul Bloom2007About 24 hoursbeginner
We recommend it as the background card: if a paper on this shelf felt like it was written for someone else, this is the course that makes it readable. Note that it is a 2007 term, so the most contested recent findings are not in it.
Negotiation and Conflict Management (MIT 15.667)
Prof. Mary Rowe2001About 20 hoursintermediate
We recommend it after Getting to Yes: the book gives you the four moves, this gives you the exercises that make them survive a real conversation. The 2001 materials are dated in examples, not in method.
Introduction to Probability (MIT RES.6-012)
Prof. John Tsitsiklis and Prof. Patrick Jaillet2018About 40 hoursadvanced
We recommend it only to members who want the mathematics itself. For everything else on this shelf, the Analyst mode's prior-evidence-posterior card in words is enough.
Psychology and Economics (MIT 14.13)
Prof. Frank Schilbach2020About 36 hoursadvanced
We recommend it for the member who has read the popular behavioural books and wants the models and the evidence underneath them, which is where the qualifications live.
Introduction to Psychology (MIT 9.00SC)
Prof. John D. E. Gabrieli2011About 34 hoursbeginner
We recommend it as the background course for the whole catalogue: a member who has watched it will read every psychology paper here with the field's methods already in view.
Minds and Machines (MIT 24.09)
Prof. Alex Byrne2011About 30 hoursadvanced
We recommend it beside the neuroscience cards, because a member who can say what a brain measurement would and would not settle is much harder to sell a brain claim to.
Philosophy and the Science of Human Nature (Yale PHIL 181)
Professor Tamar Gendler2011About 26 hoursintermediate
We recommend it as the course that connects the practical shelves here to the older question they all assume an answer to, and because Gendler is a genuinely excellent lecturer.
Game Theory (Yale ECON 159)
Professor Ben Polak2007About 28 hoursintermediate
We recommend it as the strategy shelf's formal counterpart: the books there teach you to choose, and this teaches you to reason about the person choosing against you.
Model ThinkingPublic
Scott E. PageAbout 22 hoursintermediate
We recommend it as the systems shelf's course, and because it teaches the habit that this catalogue is arranged around: holding several accounts of the same thing rather than settling on one.
Mindshift: Break Through Obstacles to Learning and Discover Your Hidden Potential
Barbara Oakley and Terrence SejnowskiAbout 14 hoursbeginner
We recommend it as the second course after Learning How to Learn, with the same caveat: take the routines, and come to the papers on this shelf for the evidence behind them.
Introduction to Mathematical Thinking
Keith DevlinAbout 40 hoursadvanced
We recommend it as the hardest course on this shelf and the one with the widest reach: precision about what a statement claims is the skill underneath every card in the evidence collection.

All notes

The sourced notes, and what is planned and not written yet.

How a pathway works

Stages, practice and spaced review — and the claim it declines to make.

The thinking modes

The four families, and the question each mode asks first.