Brainmaxing
Fuel · Brain Diet

Micronutrients: who should be tested

Reviewed

Reviewed on 2026-09-19 against the evidence rules: every claim carries a grade, every claim and every safety flag carries a source, and every citation was re-resolved against the record it names. The read was delegated by the owner on 2026-09-18 and signed by the Lead on his behalf (D-295) — it is a delegated review, not the owner's own reading of the page. Every claim on it carries an evidence grade and a named weakest link. It is educational and is not medical advice.

Last reviewed

The largest review in this section found no vitamin or mineral strategy that maintains cognition in healthy adults. The one trial here that found an effect studied women who were deficient. That difference is the whole entry: correcting a shortfall is not the same claim as topping up.

Before anything else

Safety

  • Adverse effects

    Iron: national guidance puts requirements at 8.7 mg a day for men and women over 50 and 14.8 mg for women aged 19 to 49. Doses over 20 mg can cause constipation, nausea, vomiting and stomach pain; 17 mg or less a day is unlikely to cause harm. These are ceilings, not targets.

    Source: Iron — Vitamins and minerals

  • Adverse effects

    Vitamin D: do not take more than 100 micrograms — 4,000 IU — a day. Too much over a long period causes calcium to build up, which can weaken bones and damage the kidneys and heart.

    Source: Vitamin D — Vitamins and minerals

  • Interaction

    Three ordinary medicines appear in the B12 risk list: proton pump inhibitors, metformin and nitrous oxide. Anyone taking one of them has a reason to raise B12 at a routine appointment.

    Source: Causes — Vitamin B12 or folate deficiency anaemia

  • No data in your group

    The Cochrane null covers adults aged 40 and over. Younger adults are outside it, which cuts both ways: there is no evidence of benefit for them either, only less evidence of anything.

    Source: Vitamin and mineral supplementation for maintaining cognitive function in cognitively healthy people in mid and late life

Every claim, with its grade

What the evidence says, and how strong it is

A grade belongs to one claim, in one population, for one preparation — never to a compound, a food or a page. Open a grade to see the four links between the evidence and the thing you would actually do, and which of them is doing the least work.

  • Across 28 studies and more than 83,000 people, a Cochrane review found no evidence that any vitamin or mineral supplementation strategy has a meaningful effect on cognitive decline or dementia in cognitively healthy adults. This is the largest result on the page and it is a null.

    In whom: Cognitively healthy adults aged 40 and over

    What form: Any vitamin or mineral supplementation strategy

    Measured as: Cognitive decline and dementia

    Evidence grade B: May support

    Evidence does not support

    Why this grade
    Weakest link
    Population — the people studied are not the people reading. The review covers adults aged 40 and over, so the null is powerful about them and says much less about someone in their twenties, where almost nobody has looked.
    What was actually studied
    Cognitively healthy adults aged 40 and over; 28 studies (n = 83000)
    Detail worth knowing
    Found no evidence that any vitamin or mineral supplementation strategy for cognitively healthy adults in mid or late life has a meaningful effect on cognitive decline or dementia. `n` is the reported 'over 83,000 participants', rounded down to the figure the abstract states.
  • In a trial of women aged 18 to 35 of varied iron status, iron status was a significant factor in task performance, and deficiency affected accuracy across several tasks. It is a single trial with 113 people at follow-up.

    In whom: Women aged 18–35 who were iron deficient

    What form: Iron supplementation over 16 weeks, with iron status measured throughout

    Measured as: Accuracy and speed on laboratory attention and memory tasks

    Evidence grade B: May support
    Why this grade
    Weakest link
    Study quality — design, size, blinding or replication. One trial with 113 people at follow-up, never replicated — the pattern across three iron-status groups is what makes it interesting, and it is still one trial.
    What was actually studied
    Women aged 18–35 of varied iron status; 149 at baseline, 113 at follow-up (n = 113, retested after 16 weeks of treatment, of 149 measured at baseline)
    Detail worth knowing
    Concludes that iron status is a significant factor in cognitive performance in women of reproductive age, with iron deficiency affecting accuracy across diverse laboratory tasks. A single trial.
  • Across 67 trials and 8,506 women, daily iron reduced anaemia and iron deficiency, raised haemoglobin and iron stores, improved exercise performance and reduced symptomatic fatigue. Gastrointestinal side effects increased. These are the established outcomes; thinking is not among them.

    In whom: Menstruating women aged 12–50

    What form: Daily iron supplementation

    Measured as: Anaemia, haemoglobin, iron stores, symptomatic fatigue and exercise performance

    Evidence grade B: May support
    Why this grade
    Weakest link
    Population — the people studied are not the people reading. The 8,506 participants are menstruating women aged 12 to 50, which is the group with a reason to be short of iron and not the general adult reader.
    What was actually studied
    Menstruating women aged 12–50; 67 trials (n = 8506)
    Detail worth knowing
    Daily iron supplementation reduces anaemia and iron deficiency, raises haemoglobin and iron stores, improves exercise performance and reduces symptomatic fatigue; gastrointestinal side effects increase. Cognitive outcomes were sparsely reported.
  • Cognitive outcomes were sparsely reported in the Cochrane review, and the trial that found an effect found it where iron was low. Nothing here supports taking iron on the assumption of a shortfall, and iron has a documented dose above which harm is expected.

    In whom: Adults whose iron status is normal

    What form: Iron supplementation without a measured shortfall

    Measured as: Any cognitive measure

    Evidence grade D: Human evidence insufficient
    Why this grade
    Weakest link
    Preparation — what was tested is not what is sold. Iron given to somebody with a normal ferritin is not the intervention either source tested; both recruited on iron status or in a group where shortfall is common.
    What was actually studied
    Menstruating women aged 12–50; 67 trials (n = 8506); Women aged 18–35 of varied iron status; 149 at baseline, 113 at follow-up (n = 113, retested after 16 weeks of treatment, of 149 measured at baseline); UK general population
    Detail worth knowing
    Daily iron supplementation reduces anaemia and iron deficiency, raises haemoglobin and iron stores, improves exercise performance and reduces symptomatic fatigue; gastrointestinal side effects increase. Cognitive outcomes were sparsely reported.
    Concludes that iron status is a significant factor in cognitive performance in women of reproductive age, with iron deficiency affecting accuracy across diverse laboratory tasks. A single trial.
    Requirements 8.7 mg/day for men 19 and over, 14.8 mg/day for women 19–49, 8.7 mg/day for women 50 and over. Doses over 20 mg can cause constipation, nausea, vomiting and stomach pain; 17 mg or less a day is unlikely to cause harm.
  • National guidance names the risk groups: pernicious anaemia, diets without meat, fish or dairy including vegan diets without fortified food or a supplement, stomach surgery, Crohn's disease, and the medicines proton pump inhibitors, metformin and nitrous oxide.

    In whom: UK adults

    What form: No supplement — a blood test discussed with a clinician

    Measured as: Identification of who has a reason to have their vitamin B12 measured

    Evidence grade B: May support
    Why this grade
    Weakest link
    Outcome — what was measured is not what you would notice. What this establishes is who has a reason to have a level checked, which is a triage question for a clinician rather than a measurement of anything on this page.
    What was actually studied
    UK general population
    Detail worth knowing
    Names the risk groups this entry lists: pernicious anaemia (the most common UK cause), diets without meat, fish or dairy including vegan diets without fortified foods or a supplement, stomach surgery, Crohn's disease, and the medicines proton pump inhibitors, metformin and nitrous oxide. Stores last 2–5 years.
Sources

Everything above, and where it comes from

  1. Rutjes AW, Denton DA, Di Nisio M, et al. (2018). Vitamin and mineral supplementation for maintaining cognitive function in cognitively healthy people in mid and late life. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2018(12):CD011906.pub2meta-analysis · Cognitively healthy adults aged 40 and over; 28 studies · checked 2026-08-23Found no evidence that any vitamin or mineral supplementation strategy for cognitively healthy adults in mid or late life has a meaningful effect on cognitive decline or dementia. `n` is the reported 'over 83,000 participants', rounded down to the figure the abstract states.
  2. Murray-Kolb LE, Beard JL (2007). Iron treatment normalizes cognitive functioning in young women. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 85(3):778–787rct · Women aged 18–35 of varied iron status; 149 at baseline, 113 at follow-up · checked 2026-08-23Concludes that iron status is a significant factor in cognitive performance in women of reproductive age, with iron deficiency affecting accuracy across diverse laboratory tasks. A single trial.
  3. Low MS, Speedy J, Styles CE, De-Regil LM, Pasricha SR (2016). Daily iron supplementation for improving anaemia, iron status and health in menstruating women. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2016(4):CD009747.pub2meta-analysis · Menstruating women aged 12–50; 67 trials · checked 2026-08-23Daily iron supplementation reduces anaemia and iron deficiency, raises haemoglobin and iron stores, improves exercise performance and reduces symptomatic fatigue; gastrointestinal side effects increase. Cognitive outcomes were sparsely reported.
  4. National Health Service (UK) (2020). Iron — Vitamins and minerals. nhs.uk, page last reviewed 3 August 2020review · UK general population · checked 2026-08-23Requirements 8.7 mg/day for men 19 and over, 14.8 mg/day for women 19–49, 8.7 mg/day for women 50 and over. Doses over 20 mg can cause constipation, nausea, vomiting and stomach pain; 17 mg or less a day is unlikely to cause harm.
  5. National Health Service (UK) (2023). Causes — Vitamin B12 or folate deficiency anaemia. nhs.uk, page last reviewed 20 February 2023review · UK general population · checked 2026-08-23Names the risk groups this entry lists: pernicious anaemia (the most common UK cause), diets without meat, fish or dairy including vegan diets without fortified foods or a supplement, stomach surgery, Crohn's disease, and the medicines proton pump inhibitors, metformin and nitrous oxide. Stores last 2–5 years.
  6. National Health Service (UK) (2020). Vitamin D — Vitamins and minerals. nhs.uk, page last reviewed 3 August 2020review · UK general population · checked 2026-08-23States: do not take more than 100 micrograms (4,000 IU) of vitamin D a day as it could be harmful; too much over a long period can cause hypercalcaemia, which can weaken bones and damage the kidneys and heart.
And it costs nothing

The one thing worth doing

Write down which risk groups you are actually in. For most people the list is empty, and an empty list is the result. Take a short list to your next appointment.

Nothing in this entry is medical advice, and no dose is recommended anywhere in it. The two figures quoted are upper limits from national guidance. Deficiency questions belong to a clinician with a blood result in front of them.

Every dossier

Diet first, supplements second, and the order is the argument.

Take the Snapshot

Six questions, free, scored in your browser, and no account needed.